When people think of Howard Hawks comedies, the titles that generally pop up are “Bringing Up Baby” and “His Girl Friday”, two quick-paced classics, no less distinguished though is this 1941 comedy that reunites Gary Cooper with Hawks (Sgt. York) and with Barbara Stanwyck (Meet John Doe).
Written by Billy Wilder and Charles Brackett, “Ball of Fire” is a witty comedy that retains plenty of laughs despite its almost seventy year years in age, a battle of intellect (Professors) versus brute force (gangsters).
The story itself revolves around a group of stuffy professors who are on a multiyear assignment to complete an encyclopedia. The youngest professor, Bertram Potts (Gary Cooper) is compiling a list American slang. His research takes him throughout the city, Times Square, Yankee Stadium and to a nightclub where he comes upon entertainer Sugarpuss O’Shea (Barbara Stanwyck), who is performing to Gene Krupa’s “Congo Boogie.” Sugarpuss’ distinctive and colorful vocabulary is just what the professor ordered. Convinced she is an important resource not to be lost he asks her to help him, which she is reluctant to do until she finds out the police want to question her on the where bout’s of her boyfriend, underworld thug Joe Lilac (Dana Andrews). Sugarpuss decides it might be best to “help” the stuffy professors, and hide out at their residence until she can get out of New York and meet up with her gangster boyfriend in New Jersey.
Secluded in the house, the professors, become fond of Sugarpuss as she teaches them to unstuff their rigid collars including an education on how to do the conga. However, it is the sensuous seduction Sugarpuss knowingly displays toward the studious. naïve but good-looking Bertram that sets the fires burning. Once in the professors quarters, she removes her coat revealing her skimpy costume and when she gives Bertram her cold wet bare foot to warm up displaying her equally naked and shapely leg, the girl knows full well the effect she is having not just of Bertram but the entire professorial staff. Bertram is soon hooked and before you know it, he is impetuously proposing marriage.
Before the nuptials can be finalized, Joe Lilac’s thugs show up and haul the entire group toward Jersey, using the professors as a cover to smuggle the on the lam Sugarpuss over the New York/New Jersey border. By this time, of course Sugarpuss has fallen in love with Bertram. There is a climatic confrontation between the professors and the hoods, and just like Hawks underdog heroes in “Rio Bravo”, the professors against all odds overcome their better-equipped adversaries with brains over brawn.
True, the premise is silly, seven professors secluded for years living under one roof. At close to two hours the film is a bit long, some trimming would have picked up the pace, yet there is more to recommend than dismiss, a witty script, fine performances from the top on down. There is also Gene Krupa and his orchestra and some nice deep focus photography courtesy of Greg Toland.
Stanwyck is sexy and uninhibited as Sugarpuss, perfect for the role conveying a combination of a typical sassy New York character only to reveal a soft tender side underneath the hard exterior. Deservedly she received an Oscar nomination for her performance. Surprisingly, Stanwyck was not producer Sam Goldwyn’s first choice for the role, nor was she second or even the third. Goldwyn first offered the role to Ginger Rogers who turned it down and then to Jean Arthur and Carole Lombard. Even Lucille Ball was considered before offering it to Stanwyck who gladly and wisely accepted. While I relish the idea of Arthur or Lombard reading the dialogue of Wilder and Brackett, I cannot image anyone doing a better job in the role than Babs did here.
Cooper was set for his role from the beginning. It all came about when Sam Goldwyn wanted Wilder and Brackett to write a script for Coop who he had under contract and was having a tough time finding a suitable project for him. Old Sam made a deal with Paramount, who the writers were under contract to, that involved Coop going to Paramount for one film, which would turn out to be “For Whom the Bells Toll” while Goldwyn got Wilder and Brackett, and the use of Bob Hope for another film (They Got Me Covered). The script Wilder came up with was from a story he wrote back in his early days in per-war Germany called “From A to Z.” It was updated with the help of a junior writer named Thomas Monroe. Wilder also got Goldwyn to agree that he would be allowed to stay on the set during the filming and watch Howard Hawks direct. Wilder wanted to direct his own scripts and admired Hawks work, and like Lubitsch, would become a big influence on Wilder’s directing style. Wilder has commented that he did not like the film thinking the story, a variation of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” was silly, though one has to admit Stanwyck’s Sugarpuss made for a very sexy if somewhat tainted Snow White. Wilder and Brackett did receive an Oscar nomination for best original screenplay. The script would be Wilder’s last screenplay that would be directed by someone else. The following year, he went on to direct his first feature, “The Major and the Minor.”
The supporting cast is filled with fine talents from Dana Andrews as the hoodlum Joe Lilac, to 1930′s Warner regular Allan Jenkins as the garbage collector to Oskar Homolka, Henry Travers and S.A. “Cuddles” Sakall as three of the bumbling professors. Finally there is Dan Duryea as one of Joe Lilac’s henchmen. Look also for Elisha Cook Jr. in a small role as a waiter in the early nightclub scene.
“Ball of Fire” opened to good reviews and excellent business. Released in December of 1941 to qualify for that year’s award nominations, it went into general release in January of 1942 when the film opened at Radio City Music Hall in New York.
There is a 1948 remake of this film called “A Song is Born”, also directed by Hawks with Danny Kaye and Virginia Mayo in the Cooper/Stanwyck roles. I have not seen it but I am going to go out on a small limb here and assume that it is not up to the same quality of the original.
****
Sources: Conversations with Wilder (Crowe)
Howard Hawks: The Grey Fox of Hollywood (McCarthy)

Danny Kaye? Oy! Something wonderful, I think, is that everyone played it straight.
If you see the Danny Kaye version and like it I will try it.
I had forgotten Stanwycks musical number. She really walked a fine line perfectly between, party girl/moll and someone who could get so dippy over such a square guy.
And was that one of the best casts of all time, or what?
addie
Thanks Addie,
What I did not mention is that Stanwyck does not do her own singing, however she lip synched very well. The cast is excellent and as you say very deep. I will have to check out the Kaye version but from what I here it is not in the same class.
Ball of Fire is fantastic. Great review. It’s a shame that this film, like Twentieth Century and Monkey Business, is somewhat underrated among Hawks’ comedies. It’s got great performances from Stanwyck and Cooper, both of them not quite playing against type but using their typical personae in unconventional ways. And the dialogue really crackles.
A Song Is Born is, to say the least, not really up to the standards of this film; Hawks himself disowned it before he was even done making it. It’s pretty disappointing but it at least has some good music, and hey, you get to hear a lot of the great jokes from Ball of Fire all over again.
Ed,
Agree the film is underrated and the script just sparkles. There are some great throwaway lines by Stanwyck. I wish she and Cooper had made more films together they made a great team.
I would expected A SONG IS BORN not to be up to snuff, but it is probably work checking out for a comparison. From what I read Wilder thought BALL OF FIRE was “silly” so I would imagine that he thought even less of the latter.
Thanks for stopping by Ed, appreciate it.
What is it that convinced me that Ed Howard would come barreling in on this review? Ha! Has he ever heard of Howard Hawks? Something tells me he has. Ha!
Just kidding of course.
Yes, this is one of Hawks’s masterworks, and it contains one of Ms. Stanwyck’s greatest performances. I do feel however, that BALL OF FIRE is not underrated, at least not at the present time, and not among some discering cineastes and historian. Among that lot is the always-engaging Danny Peary, who is his invaluable 1993 volume “Alternate Oscars” tabbed the film as the runner-up of 1941 to CITIZEN KANE, and he even righty took away the Oscars from Joan Fontaine and from Cooper for his SERGEANT YORK turn, instead awarding tops honors to Stanwyck and Cooper for BALL OF FIRE. But there are othe rindications that the film is finally getting the respect it deserves, and John this is far more than just a representational essay. Real nice.
Thanks very much Sam. I remember Peary’s book but have not seen it in years. Sgt. York is one of the few Hawks works that I am not a big fan of, not Hawks fault just the story itself. We also get to see the great Gene Krupa in this film which is a nice treat.
[...] One of the net’s most prolific writers, John Greco, has another marvelous review from Hollywood’s Golden Age up, and it’s Hawks’s Ball of Fire: http://twentyfourframes.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/ball-of-fire-1941-howard-hawks-2/ [...]
Hi John, great review as ever! I haven’t seen this one yet, but, as it features a combination of Hawks and Stanwyck, I’m very keen to do so before too long. I’m slightly surprised to hear she didn’t do her own singing in this one, as she does sing at the start of Wellman’s ‘The Purchase Price’ (I’ve read that she wasn’t dubbed in that film) and her voice is quite good, I’d say.
Thanks Judy, I think you will like this when you see it. It’s a lot of fun with a very good cast, both lead and supporting.
A Fine review! It’s also a reminder once again how wonderful Stanwyck–and now that I think about it–Cooper are. Coop was always so good in those awkward, bashful-type roles. I love his demeanor and posture when he’s taking notes during Sugarpuss’ number!
It’s perfomances like the one in Ball of Fire that drives home what is always so great about Coop–he comes off as “too subtle” until the viewer suddenly realizes how much work is going into what he’s doing! Cooper never came off as arty or stagey and was as natural a performer as there ever was in the Golden Age–or any other time.
After reading your review I’m ashamed that Cooper wasn’t ranked higher on my favorite actors list!
Thanks much C.K.
I just cannot get enoug Stanwyck and she is wonderful in this role. Cooper is deceptively good. You think he isn’t doing much but it all works so well. THe rest of the cast is quite good too and a good script of course helped.
A Song is Born’s best qualities are the musicians.
I have heard the same comment from others about this remake. Thanks again!!!
[...] Images courtesy of this guy. [...]
I’ve now seen this, on the big screen at the Howard Hawks festival at the BFI in London – sadly it was a rather dodgy print, but I still really enjoyed it and appreciated reading your review, John. I loved both Stanwyck and Cooper in this – and Dan Duryea as well. Can’t see anyone getting an Oscar nom for a comic role like this one nowadays, though of course there are no movies quite like this now anyway! Will look forward to comparing it with ‘A Song Is Born’, though I won’t hold my breath on that one.
Too bad about the bad print, still it is always good to see an old film on the big screen. From what I have heard and read, A SONG IS BORN is not very good. I thought Stanwuck and Cooper made a good team.