We are transported back to 1953 with a series of newsreel clips featuring Joe DiMaggio, Marilyn Monroe, Harry Truman, The Korean War, Bomb Shelters, the Rosenberg’s while on the soundtrack Frank Sinatra sings “Young at Heart.”
Woody Allen stars and Martin Ritt directs this tale of nebbish luncheonette cashier and part-time bookie, Howard Prince. Childhood friend Alfred Miller (Michael Murphy) now a writer of live TV dramas informs him one day that he is no longer employable, blacklisted by the Freedom Information Service, a group working for the TV networks screening employees suspected of being communists. Miller tells Howard he needs another name, a real person and offers to pay Howard ten percent of his income if he is willing to put his name on the cover of the scripts he writes and act as a “Front.” Desperate for money, and a loyal friend, Howard, not fully realizing the potential implications, agrees to the deal. He is soon a successful and in demand writer ‘Fronting’ not only for Alfred but two other blacklisted writers. His success draws praise and admiration from the show’s producer Phil Sussman (Herschel Bernardi), and script editor Florence Barrett (Andrea Marcovicci) who he soon begins dating. Howard also meets Hecky Brown (Zero Mostel) a former Vaudeville comedian now on television, and under the watchful eyes of the Freedom Information Service.
Howard’s success leads to fancy clothes and a ritzy apartment. He also comes to believe the praise bestowed upon him by the network brass and he begins to reject some scripts submitted to him by the writers as beneath his standards. Hecky meanwhile, is hounded by the blacklisting group and is “encouraged,” for his own good, to spy on and inform on co-workers, like Howard who the agency has been looking into but cannot find any proof he was ever a party member but, the investigator adds when talking to a TV exec, they cannot prove he was never a party member either. Everyone is guilty until proven otherwise.
Howard’s problems begin to escalate. First the producers need an immediate rewrite (it’s live TV) and hold him hostage on the set until he submits new pages. He manages to avoid this near disaster but it is only the beginning. Hecky, continually hounded by the investigators, is finding it more and more difficult to get a job, commits suicide. The investigating committee continues to look into Howard’s background. Florence quits her job deciding to write a pamphlet exposing the underhanded tactics of the committee and the television station, and she wants Howard to quit his lucrative writing job and join her in the crusade. In addition, the F.B.I. has been keeping an eye on him, finding out who his friends are, even snapping photos of Howard morosely viewing Hecky’s funeral from afar. He is soon brought before a HUAC sub-committee for questioning. Howard has no political ideologies to confess, he admittedly is very shallow and his only interest was making money. They want him to name his friends which he refuses to do. After continuing to evade answering their questions, he tells the committee to “go fuck themselves.” In the final scene Howard, handcuffed to a law officer, is embraced by Florence and cheered off by supporters as he heads of to jail. Frank Sinatra’s “Young at Heart” plays on the soundtrack.
Ritt and Bernstein, both of whom were blacklisted in the early fifties, knew each other since those early days of live TV and also worked together on two movies (Paris Blues and The Molly Maguires) prior to “The Front.” The director and writer had been discussing making a film about the blacklist for years but were nervous about a serious drama being too preachy and also finding it hard to get financing. The studios would demand a big name to help protect their investment. Bernstein felt a lighter approach with serious overtones could make the film more acceptable. Dustin Hoffman’s name was mentioned. Then Woody’s name came up. It would be his first straight role. Allen hesitantly agreed to be in the film (In a New York Times article by Guy Flatley, Allen pleaded with Ritt to replace him with Peter Falk), it was a stretch but it wasn’t “Hamlet” either. While Bernstein is given sole credit for the script the film contains lines that seem very Woody like. For example, when Florence discusses her upper class childhood life, she says, “the biggest sin was to raise one’s voice.” Howard responds, “In my family, the biggest sin was to buy retail.” Later when he admits to Florence he is not really a writer, he adds “I can barely write a grocery list.” However, some of the humor is a bit darker, at one point Howard is told to change a holocaust scene in a script because one of the advertisers is a gas company.
Woody was uncomfortable throughout the filming. He felt out of his element and he had no control over the making of the film, yet it is the ‘Woody’ persona that helped make the film more appealing to the general movie going audience, and the studio, who would not sit through an overbearing diatribe on the blacklist. Though both Ritt and Bernstein were passionate about wanting to make the film, the results are rather uneven, at times fiery and other times rather passionless and cool toward its subject matter, surprisingly so for this director whose films include “Norma Rae”, The Great White Hope,” and “Sounder.” Part of the reason may be due to some of the other cast members. Andrea Marcovicci is lifeless in a role that required anger, as is Michael Murphy’s dull blacklisted writer. It is actually Allen’s performance, and Zero Mostel’s, that hold the film together. They are the Yin and Yang of the film, polar opposites not only physically but in humor and the audiences they speak too. Woody’s character is one whose only interest is in making money and reaping his new found fame as a writer until he finally transforms into a man who takes a moral stand and responsibility at the end of the film. Howard’s inquisition before the committee reveals the absurdity of the proceedings when in order to avoid jail time he is offered the opportunity to name names even if it is the dead Hecky Brown. Mostel’s Hecky Brown is based partially on his own experience of being blacklisted and the indignities he faced. The Catskill scene of being chiseled down on salary is based on an incident Mostel came face to face with. Bernstein also blended into Hecky Brown the story of actor Philip Loeb whose career tanked after he was blacklisted. The pressure of the blacklist for Loeb, along with being the sole support for his mentally ill son was finally too much. Depressed, he overdosed on sleeping pills in a room at the Hotel Taft in New York. In his book, “Inside Out: A Memoir of the Blacklist,” Walter Bernstein discusses Loeb’s ordeal in detail. Other blacklisted cast members appearing in the film include, Herschel Bernardi, Lloyd Gough and Joshua Shelley.
There are plenty of villains in this story; politicians, the Government, television executives, corporate sponsors all who formed a loose alliance conspiring to mock the real freedom America stands for.

Nice article on a movie that I’d never even heard of, despite having once been a hardcore Woody Allen fan. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I’ve stuck your article up on my Facebook profile as I’m sure it will be of interest to a few of my friends.
Just a couple of points. There seems to be an issue in this sentence:-
‘Hecky, continually hounded by the investigators is finding it more and more difficult to get a job, commits suicide.’
A comma is missing and probably ‘and eventually’ before commits suicide. Also there are a few points later on where you get who, whom and whose mixed-up.
Thanks for very much for both the nice words and the points on my sloppy writing. I do appreciate it and made the adjustments in the article.
John,
Although not my favorite Woody Allen performance, it’s fascinating to see Woody outside of his own films. It’s also a fascinating important story covering a topic that has historical significance. I do like the film, although I wonder if it would have been better had Woody directed it. I always wonder about that.
Jon, Interesting point on how different it could have been if Woody had directed it. I’m not sure. He certainly has done his share of dramatic works, still that’s a question I have to think about.
John, another fine review of a film that ultimately promises more than it delivers. Still, it addresses a dark period in American cinema that’s been ignored for the most part (with a few exceptions such as GUILTY BY SUSPICION). It’s a nice change of pace for Woody, even though, as you wrote, his persona still comes through.
Appreciate it Rick. I am in agreement with you that the film promises more than it delivers. I would think filmmakers have a wealth of material in this topic that is yet to be explored. There is a wonderful documentary that was made a couple of years ago called TRUMBO that is very much worth seeing for anyone interested in this topic.
Yep, I’m also with you on that point John. It’s not remotely among my favorite Allens–in fact it’s in the bottom wrung. I’m sure the Woodman felt much as Stanley Kubrick did during the filming of Spartacus, and much like Allen’s “persona” shining through in THE FRONT, Kubrick’s stamp was still on the epic for it’s better qualities throughout. Anyway, great review of a film that as you aptly note is markedly “uneven.”
Sam, I thought we be pretty much on the same page with this film. Uneven is the perfect word. It shows signs that it could have been so much better, I believe Ritt and Bernstein aimed high but unfortunately did not reach the levels they were shooting for.
John – I must’ve last seen “The Front” when it was in release and didn’t remember much about it till reading your review. Your last line speaks volumes…
Eve – I think we discussed this once before. This is the film I saw John Lennon and Yoko at the theater.
I didn’t realize (remember?) this was the movie you saw “with John and Yoko”!
John, I am a red-faced Woody Allen lover who has never seen The Front. I am going immediately to Netflix and order it. This is right up my alley, and your review has really made me want to see it. That’s the best thing I can think of to say in complimenting an article! Thanks, John!
Becky, I think you will enjoy like this. Let me know what you think!
Thanks!!!
John, I was truly impressed with your thoughtful review of THE FRONT! I remember seeing THE FRONT with my older brother during the film’s initial theatrical release when I was 13 and a huge Woody Allen fan. (Don’t get me wrong, I like most of Allen’s work now, too, but when I was 13, my hormones usually got the better of me, and I was always drawn to offbeat, endearing nebbish types.
) My brother usually took me to the “grownup” movies he liked to see, so we saw THE FRONT together. Though now I can see the uneven parts of the film, I was (and am) moved and fascinated by what the fact-based characters in the film went through. It was one of those films that made me more interested in the more serious things going on in the world. I suspect that if Woody Allen had directed THE FRONT himself, and more to the point, if he’d had the maturity and gumption he developed as a writer and actor in his later hears, THE FRONT would have been quite something! It’s still worth a look for its reminder that there’s always some power beyond our control that’s salivating at the chance to snatch our freedoms away from us, and that we mustn’t take those freedoms for granted.
Dorian – Thanks very much for your kind words here. I agree with that if the mature Woody would have directed this film the film would have been better. Still, it was and remains I believe an important film on a important topic still relevant in our world today.