The Ox Bow Incident (1943) William Wellman

ox-bow-incident-title

At this point in his career, Henry Fonda was not happy with most of the films he had made. Steinbeck’s classic novel, “The Grapes of Wrath,” was certainly one he was proud of, and thanks to John Ford, he got the role of a lifetime. Like Brando as Stanley Kowalski, or Cagney as George M. Cohan, it’s hard to imagine anyone else fitting the role of Tom Joad other than Henry Fonda. But there was a price to be paid for getting that part. 20th Century Fox honcho, Darryl F. Zanuck would only give him the role if he signed a contract with the studio. One of the films he made for Fox during this period was “The Ox-Bow Incident,” based on Walter Van Tilbert Clark’s extraordinary novel. Directed by William “Wild Bill” Wellman, the film is an oddity in westerns of the period. In 1943, the war was on and most films focused on lightweight escapist entertainment, a two hour break from worrying about husbands, fathers, sons and the horrors of what was happening in the world. “The Ox-Bow Incident” was not lightweight entertainment, it was a downbeat, ugly look at humanity with little gun play, focusing on vigilantism, group mentality, reducing men to the lowest primal level of thoughts and deeds.  It is also possibly the first psychological western ever made.

Ox-Bow Incident2Zanuck did not want to make the film, it wasn’t a commercial enough story he insisted, but Fonda and Wellman liked the script hounding Zanuck until he relented. Of course, both men had to agree to make other more commercial projects (for Fonda, it was ”The Magnificent Dope”) without any sort of bitching. All shook hands and the film went into production.

The time is 1885, in Nevada two cowboys come riding into the dusty town of Bridger’s Wells. As they dismount, one of the cowboys, Gil Carter (Henry Fonda), looks around and announces the town is “deader than a Paiute’s grave.”  He and his partner, Art Croft (Harry Morgan), looking to take a break enter the local saloon.  They quickly find out there isn’t much to do in town. There are practically no women except for those who are married. As the bartender announces there are only five things to do in town; eat, drink, sleep, play poker and fight.  Gil, who is a bit tense, was obviously hoping for some female companionship; a woman he was expecting to be available was recently asked to leave town. He gets into a fight with a cowboy named Farney (Marc Lawrence); quickly stomping on the guy, but before he can do any other further damage the bartender cracks a bottle over Gil’s head.

The Ox Bow incidentAfter Gil comes around, a young rider named Green (William Benedict) comes galloping into town and  enters the saloon announcing a local rancher by the name of Larry Kincaid, a friend of Farney’s, has been murdered and his cattle have been stolen. A group of the town folks quickly want form a posse, not bothering to wait for the sheriff.  Hanging is the only solution says Tetley (Frank Conroy), a former Confederate officer from Texas. The only voice of reason comes from Arthur Davies (Harry Davidson), a local storekeeper, who attempts to stop the men from riding out half cocked. However, Tetley, embarking on a take the law into our own hands speech, quickly gets the mob fired up and in the mood justice…lynching style.

Davies gets Judge Tyler (Matt Briggs) to try and stop the mob but to no avail. The self appointed posse, illegally sworn in by the town’s deputy sheriff, quickly mounts and rides out with an insatiable hunger for self appointed justice. The mob includes female rancher Jenny Grier (Jane Darwell) along with the reluctant son of Tetley who wants nothing to do with the mob or its actions.

Gil and Art ride out with the group fearing, if they did not, it would look suspicious, believing this out of control group is beginning to look like a bunch who don’t care too much who they hang. They soon come upon three men sleeping by a campfire, surround and quickly overtake the unsuspecting trio. The head cowboy is Donald Martin (Dana Andrews). With him are a Mexican named Juan Martinez (Anthony Quinn) and an old man (Francis Ford). The men explain they recently purchased the cattle legally from Kincaid, but they have no bill of sale to prove it. The mob is quickly convinced these guys are lying and are the killers. Led by Tetley, the mob wants to string them up right then and there. Gil and the storekeeper Davies plead for some time, until dawn, to let Martin write one final letter to his wife and for the men to pray. Gil promises Martin he will deliver the note to his wife.

Ox Bow IncidentAs the sun rises, the three men are hanged. Though there is a reluctance as to who will actually do the deed. Tough lady rancher, Jenny, soon volunteers. As the mob rides back to town, they run into the Sherriff coming back from Kincaid’s ranch, he tells the men Kincaid was not murdered, only wounded, and they caught the real cattle rustlers just a while ago. When the sheriff asks Davies, who he trusts, who did the hanging, Davies tells him, all but seven. The sheriff responds, “God, better have mercy on ya. You won’t get any from me”

Vigilantism, the mob mentality of taking the law into one’s own hand has been dealt with in films from Fritz Lang’s “Fury” and Merlyn LeRoy’s “The Won’t Forget” to “Black Legion” and “Hang ‘em High.” People claiming to have God on their side, forget about laws and decency, instead they deal out their own blood lust form of justice. Here, these men are vultures, filled with their own self serving sense of morality, looking down on their prey with no evidence, only an unchecked lust for revenge.

Wellman’s use of the camera is telling. When the vigilante mob first comes upon the three luckless cowboys, he uses a low angle shot as the mob approaches with Farley and Tetley looming large looking down at the depression like area where the three men are innocently sleeping. The victims are quickly surrounded and remain visually in lower angles.

Henry Fonda’s Gil Carter is one of the most enigmatic characters he has ever portrayed, at times bitter, partly because of a broken relationship with Mary Beth Hughes who shows up for one brief scene. Other times he is the voice of reason, the kind of role Fonda has portrayed repeatedly throughout his career. There is a scene toward the end of the film where Gil reads out loud the letter written by Dana Andrews character to his wife. It’s as strong and memorable a scene as anything Fonda had ever done.

We know from the beginning the victims are innocent, you see it in the magnificent, heart wrenching performance of Dana Andrews as one of the unlucky three. He’s stunned when his accusers tell him what he is being indicted for. “We haven’t done anything,” he pleads.  Anthony Quinn as Juan Martinez, another of the accused is snidely defiant. In his eyes you can see a lifetime of discrimination and accusations that have been leveled at him for no other reason than he is Mexican.

the_ox_bow_incident-QuinnThe film is filled with other fine performances, particularly from Jane Darwell’s dirty, screeching rancher to Frank Convoy’s brutal, egotistical, sanctimonious Southern major.

Shot in just 30 days by director William Wellman, a filmmaker known for working quick and having little if any pretentions about film as art, yet here he is making a film as dark, both in tone and photography, as Fritz Lang. Wellman was no stranger to making films containing a social message having previously made “The Public Enemy,” “Heroes for Sale” and “Wild Boys of the Road.”

“The Ox-Bow Incident” was nominated for Best Picture but would lose to Michael Curtiz’s “Casablanca.” The film’s one major flaw is its artificial sets and studio lighting. Obviously, most of this film takes place outdoors, but it is clearly a studio setting, still don’t let this put you off, it remains one of the most powerful indictments on the bad behavior of human beings.

This review is part of the CMBA FILMS OF THE FABULOUS FORTIES Blogathon. The blogathon runs from Feb. 17th through Feb. 22nd. You can check out more entries to this event by clicking right here.

About these ads

41 comments to The Ox Bow Incident (1943) William Wellman

  1. John Mulholland says:

    Thanks for this very nice piece on The Ox-Bow Incident. As usual, excellent!

    Gary Cooper was first offered the part. But he turned it down because he felt that his presence would overshadow the drama. He felt it would become a Gary Cooper picture, and the audience would be waiting for — indeed, expecting — his character to save the day. He knew that this would undermine and weaken the movie. He was correct.

    Several years later, Fonda was Carl Foreman’s first choice for Will Kane, High Noon. But he had been “greylisted” by then and was in NYC only doing theater (no films for Fonda between 1948 — 1955, instead, on Broadway in such as The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial, Mr. Roberts, etc.). So after Cooper finally got the part of Will Kane, after seemingly half of Hollywood had turned it down, Fonda told Cooper that he had returned the favor — Ox-Bow Incident for High Noon.

    While on Cooper and Fonda, it’s interesting to compare the treatment of lynching, unlawful posses, vigilantism, between 1929 — The Virginian — and 1943 — Ox-Bow Incident. In The Virginian, Cooper hangs his best friend, along with several others, without a trial, only a self-appointed posse. Cooper and the posse are the good guys. This change in outlook perhaps explains why, in the feeble remake of The Virginian in 1946, The Virginian is not involved in hanging his best friend.

    • John Greco says:

      Thanks John. I was unaware of the Cooper/Fonda thing with HIGH NOON. Good point on the comparison of the two VIRGINIAN films. I have seen the remake but I do need to still get a hold of the 1929 version. Thanks again!

  2. KimWilson says:

    John, this was an interesting pick. It is a standout from the 1940s, but doesn’t really come up much when discussing the period. Fonda was very good at playing stand-up characters full of indignation. Good point about this probably being the first psychological western.

    • John Greco says:

      Thanks Kim, This is actually one of my favorite westerns and I love Fonda when he is in one of these kind of roles where he takes a moral, righteous stand.

  3. R. D. Finch says:

    John, this film was tremendously popular with critics when it came out, and Wellman lost the NY Film Critics award for best director to George Stevens, “The More the Merrier,” by one vote. Because of its theme, the book has always been popular for school literature courses, and I recall reading it in high school for an English class. I’ve stated before that I have reservations about Wellman as a director. His films are always dynamic but often strike me as carelessly directed. But there’s no doubt his actors responded to his direction, and his films are full of great acting.

    This is definitely one of Fonda’s great performances. To watch him go from a disinterested bystander to a stunned and helpless witness to a horrible miscarriage of justice is a thrilling experience for anyone interested in great acting. The scene you describe where he reads the letter is one of the key scenes of his career. Where a less naturalistic actor might have played the scene bombastically or sentimentally, Fonda plays it with total restraint. The ever-reliable Harry Morgan is a wonderful sidekick, and Jane Darwell is a knockout in an untypically sinister role. I prefer her here to her Oscar-winning turn in “The Grapes of Wrath.”

    • John Greco says:

      R.D. – Wellman might be a bit sloppy but many of his films strike a chord. I love his films that deal with social issues, like this one. His heart is in the right place at these times. As for Fonda, I always admired him as an actor and think, like Wellman, with it comes to films with social issues, his heart and soul are in the right place. He doesn’t overdo it, as you mention, when he reads the letter, he does it with “total restraint,” making it even more powerful. I am with you on Darwell’s performance here too.

  4. Rick says:

    John, like R.D. Finch, I read the novel in high school (and, in fact, made a Super 8mm version of it for a class project…I was no William Wellman). It wasn’t until years later that I saw the 1943 film. It’s very good, but–for me–lacks the impact of other films about mob injustice (e.g., FURY, THE SOUND OF FURY). The cast is excellent and it certainly helped set the tone for the darker Westerns of the 1950s. Based on your excellent review, I need to watch it again.

    • John Greco says:

      Rick, FURY is an excellent film which I try to catch everytime it pops up on TCM. THE SOUND OF FURY, I an unfamilar with and will have to check it out. Thanks!!!

  5. Years ago I attended an evening with William Wellman when he had written his autobiography “A Short Time for Insanity”. The evening included two of his films that he took great pride in, “Wild Boys of the Road” and “The Ox-Bow Incident”.

  6. Patti says:

    Though I readily admit I’m not keen on Westerns, I have seen this film. Even more, I love it…very powerful, thought-provoking, and deep. I sought it out when I was looking to see more of Dana Andrews’ works.

    Your review is awesome!! Thanks!

  7. FlickChick says:

    I admit I’m not a real western fan, either, but this one transcends the usual western fare. Plus, I’d follow Dana Andrews anywhere. Very informative post!

  8. Judy says:

    Great review, John, which has me wanting to see this film again! I remember that the US DVD has loads of extras which aren’t on my barebones UK version, so I may be tempted to get hold of the US version too. One thing that amazes me about this film is how short it is – it seems to pack such a lot into not much more than 70 minutes, with the tension building to an unbearable level. I definitely agree this is one of his greatest – haven’t as yet read the book, but I hope to do so in future. The other Western which Wellman made from a novel by Tilburg Clark, ‘The Track of the Cat’, is also excellent and that one is very much an arthouse film.

    Must agree with your comments on how excellent both Henry Fonda and Dana Andrews are in this – as is Anthony Quinn. The treatment of his character really looks back to Wellman’s early socially conscious Western ‘The Robin Hood of El Dorado,’ with the persecution of Mexican characters – that film also has a lynching of a character who hasn’t done anything, just on the say-so of somebody in a more powerful position.

    • John Greco says:

      Judy, I have been meaning to watch TRACK OF THE CAT for years now and never get around to it. It pops up on TCM and one of the local libraries has a copy too, so it’s not like I don’t have the opportunities. The film is short, Wellman does not waste a minute. Thanks!!!

  9. Page says:

    John,
    Even the poster lets you know that this film is a bit dark and depressing. (First time seeing it!)

    It’s always interesting to read why actors were cast in certain films. Usually we find out that they were obligated by their contracts, number of film commitment for a studio. That was the time and how the studio system was run then but it doesn’t make it any easier to understand or sympathize with the studios even though the actors were well compensated for their work. Fond was lucky to be cast in TOI rather than a few that he could have found himself in. For that I’m grateful.

    Do you think that the film wasn’t given a proper budget for location filming due to Wellman wanting to get it done in a short time or was it just a film that the studio really didn’t want to expend that much extra time and a budget on?

    While I enjoyed Fonda in the film, it was Quinn’s performance that stood out for me. I found myself surprisingly invested in Juan.

    Another beautifully written article, John. I always enjoy your honest reviews and from the looks of it, I have some catching up to do here once the Blogathon is over. You’ve been quite busy.

    See ya soon!
    Page

    • John Greco says:

      Page, I would imagine, but I am not positive, that Zanuck did not want to spend too much money on a project he thought was going to be a money loser. Therefore, I think to lack of location shooting for a more realistic look, was certainly a financial matter. Quinn is always a solid performer and he makes his mark in what is a supporting role. Thanks for stopping by, Page!

  10. Such a great movie! Thanks for a thoughtful and interesting review. You are right – this movie is a powerful indictment.

  11. Great selection and great film. I remember seeing it for the first time and just being blown away. Then I read the book and I frankly prefer the film, which happens so rarely! But everything about the movie is first-rate, especially the performances.

  12. Wonderful piece and great choice. This film is often overlooked, perhaps because it is so psychologically disturbing. For me, the scene where Henry Fonda reads the letter is one of the great scenes in all of film. Proving you don’t need CGI and special effect to grab an audience’s full attention.

    • John Greco says:

      Thanks Tracy! Yeah, I agree, his reading of the letter is most powerful and that is the problem with many of today’s films, all CGI and no soul!

  13. The Lady Eve says:

    John, Excellent review and back story on a very fine film – so glad Fonda and Wellman were able to convince Zanuck to make it (though sorry Fonda got stuck with “The Magnificent Dope” in the bargain). I believe I read in a Jane Fonda autobiography that her father had the experience, as a young boy, of witnessing a mob lynching of a black man. This apparently affected Fonda the rest of his life and may have been part of what compelled him to push so hard to make this film.

    • John Greco says:

      That’s true about Henry Fonda witnessing a lynching. I read the same thing meant to include that but…Thanks as always Eve!

  14. John Greco says:

    The comment below is from our friend Dorian over at TALES OF THE EASILY DISTRACTED. She had trouble signing in and emailed this to me.

    John, I was quite moved by your thoughtful, poignant review of THE OX-BOW INCIDENT. The expressions on the actors’ faces say so much. Talk about the evil that men (and even lady ranchers) do! This and Fritz Lang’s FURY both leave anger and sorrow in their wake, with plenty to think about, to say the least! For the record, if you want to compare the films, FURY is almost the The Feel-Good Movie of 1943 by comparison! Once you’ve seen THE OX-BOW INCIDENT, you’ll never forget it. But here’s a little irony for you: the first time I’d ever heard of THE OX-BOW INCIDENT, it was – if I recall correctly – from my big brother’s Woody Allen comedy album, where he describes his marriage as “The Ox-Bow Incident!” Go figure!

    • John Greco says:

      Dorian, Thanks as always. I love the Woody Allen joke and remember it well from my own copy of Woody’s albums. In fact, I had all three of his original LP’s which are probably collector’s items now but are long gone.

  15. John, thanks a million for your help in enabling me to comment on your superb OX-BOW INCIDENT post! You’re truly a gent! Best wishes to you and Dorothy from all of us here at Team Bartilucci HQ! :-D

  16. Sam Juliano says:

    John, I have used Clark’s novel in junior high school classes in the past, and have always revered this 1943 masterpiece, a film that many consider the best film of Wellmann’s career. It’s theme is timeless, and the film leaves you deeply disturbed and emotionally drained. Fonda is superb, as are Dana Andrews, Anthony Quinn and as you rightly note Jane Darwell as the lewd old hag. Darwell was also great in THE GRAPES OF WRATH as Ma Joad in an Oscar winning role. This film leaves such a compelling impression on you that you wish you could enter the scene and prove the characters’ innocence. John, you have penned a superlative review that makes clear your long time love for the film, complete with some much appreciated historical tidbits. This is truly one of the greatest of American films, and you have done complete and affectionate justice.

    • John Greco says:

      Thanks Sam, i had a feeling you may have used the novel in your classes. The novel has been a mainstay for years going back to my jr. high school days.
      Great acting and a nice atmosphere add up o the film’s enjoyment.

  17. dawn says:

    A wonderful review to what I consider a Western film Noir. I have to admit, that this is a great film, but.. I have to be in the mood to watch it..

    Fonda, was perfect playing Henry Morgan, his performance is not one you will ever forget. The story line and score keeps the viewer glued, until the twist at the end….

    • John Greco says:

      Dawn, I can understanding having to be in the mood to watch this film. It’s a depressing indictment on human behavior. Thanks for stoppoing by.

  18. Great post! I love this movie, and show it to people whenever I get a chance. Like you mentioned, it’s a stunning portrait of human behavior and the mob mentality. I think the natural nobility that Dana Andrews had also shines through here.

    • John Greco says:

      Lindsay, thanks! You’re right on target about Andrews, he is just terrific in the role, a decent man caught up in a situation beyond his control. His eyes tell you everything.

  19. ClassicBecky says:

    John, I mentioned to you on FB that although this movie is one of the best, I just can’t watch it again. It hit me so hard, the injustice, the technique of filmmaking that made the viewer live the horrendous events — too much to see again. That hasn’t happened to me often. And that shows the power of this small but tremendous movie. You’ve done it justice — excellent job.

    • John Greco says:

      Thanks very much, Becky. This is an extremely dark and sad film. Sad, because of how it reflects on man’s worst kind of behavior. I can understand you being so uncomfortable watching it.

  20. In reading a bit about Fonda’s life last month, I read that as a teen, his father took him to see a lynching in their Nebraska community. I cannot fathom why anyone would let their child view such a thing, teenaged or not! That event shook Fonda up and might have had a reason why he wanted Zanuck to let this film get made. Enjoyed your post!

    • John Greco says:

      Jenni,

      I read that also about the lynching. I agree, most fathers would try and keep thier child from seeing something like that. I would agree that the incident had to have been an influence on his choice here. Thanks for your thoughts here!!!

  21. Jnpickens says:

    Excellent film, but so hard to watch. The end breaks my heart.
    Wonderful review. And you are right, I can’t think of anyone but Henry Fonda who would fit in “Grapes of Wrath.”

  22. John Greco says:

    Thanks Jessica for the kind words. Yes, the ending is heartbreaking as it should be. GRAPES OF WRATH is a fabulous work of cinematic art and Fonda is superb as Tom Joad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s