Hugo (2011) Martin Scorsese

Martin Scorsese’s  HUGO is a film lover’s dream. A homage to those early days of cinema when virgin movie audiences would jump from their seats frightened the oncoming train would  burst right through the screen and run them over.

The film is based on the children’s novel, “The Invention of Hugo Caberet” by Brian Selznick. The last name should sound familiar. Brian is a relative of the late Hollywood producer, David O. Selznick whose classic films included “Gone with the Wind,” “Spellbound,” “Rebecca” and “David Copperfield.” It must have been some kind of organic fate that attracted  the filmmaker, connoisseur and historian Scorsese to this woven tale of fantasy and celluloid love.

Enchanting is not a word that comes to mind when discussing Martin Scorsese films but I cannot think of a better one to describe this affectionate look at the early days of a new art. The name Georges Mêliés will mean little if anything to most current filmgoers, it’s a name almost lost in the passage of time. An early pioneer in the art of film,  Mêliés  short works were innovative gems of science fiction and fantasy using cinematic techniques like stop motion, time lapse photography, dissolves and editing to create early celluloid magic with works  like, “A Trip to the Moon” (1902) and “The Impossible Voyage” (1903).   

 Scorsese not only channels Mêliés but also pieces of Steven Spielberg (childhood adventure), Tim Burton (machinery), Fritz Lang (the automaton) and Harold Lloyd ( Hugo hanging from the arm of a clock) and in the process created one of the best films of the year. A film that will be enjoyed by anyone of any age with a keen imagination.

The Director visually astonishes the audience with stunning camera movement. For example, there is an early scene inside the large railway station, where most of the film unfolds, Scorsese’s camera  plows its way through a crowd of people in a stunning shot, pushing deeper and deeper into the congested  station, thrusting us right into the middle of the hustle and bustle. He frames much of the film from Hugo’s point of view, who for most of the film is a passive character. He is a spectator watching the world unfold, much like the audience. This is reinforced by various shots through windows giving us a sense the young boy is watching a movie unfold. New York Times critic Manohla Dargis calls “Hugo” a  ‘proxy for a young  Mr. Scorsese.’

The railway station is where Hugo (Asa Butterfield) lives since the unexpeceted death of his father (Jude Law). He was brought there by a gruff Uncle (Ray Winstone) whose job it is to keep the station’s many clocks working precisely. The Uncle soon disappears and Hugo is left alone with his one remembrance of his father,  an automaton in need of repair. Hugo’s attempts to repair the android involve stealing pulleys, wheels and other parts from a cranky old toy seller (Ben Kingsley)whose small toy repair shop is located inside the railway station. The old man eventually catches Hugo, demands he returns the parts he has stolen , even confiscating a small book of Hugo’s given to him by his father. The unlikely pair strike a deal, Hugo will work around the old man’s shop. In exchange, the old man will return his book, maybe. Hugo soon meets Isabelle, who it turns out is the goddaughter of Hugo’s new boss. Together they soon discover a hidden secret the grumpy and melancholy old man has tried to forget. He was and is the once great innovator and pioneer filmmaker, Georges Mêliés, thought dead by many, and his films all lost. A film historian, the two youngsters met in a library, brings back recognition to the defeated Mêliés, and we soon learn many of his films thought lost have been found in vaults and basements around the world where they laid dusty and forgotten for many years.  Hugo also discovers the one missing link to repairing the automaton, restoring it to its original working order, a gold shaped key hanging as a ornament around  Isabelle’s neck.

Scorsese has created a film about a young boy and old man, both frightened, lost, deprived of their dreams. In the course of the film, the boy manages to restore the automaton, and the old man find  his creative genius has not been lost nor forgotten. Essentially, Scorsese has  created a fascinating allegory of film preservation and restoration. A film that only Martin Scorsese could have brought to the screen with such love and devotion.    

I watched the film in 3-D, a process I generally attend to avoid as I have found it unnecessary in the few films I have seen in this format. It generally comes across as a lazy way for the filmmakers to create a “wow” moment from audiences who are moved when a flying piece of debris seems to be coming right at them, similar to the early unsophisticated audiences who screamed when they first watched that train coming at them back in those primitive days of movie going in store fronts and sitting on wooden benches. Here, Scorsese’s use of 3-D is reserved yet it seems to enhance the visual aspects of the story without getting in the way.

Frankly, I am not sure this film will be for everyone, young children especially. That’s a problem since this is supposedly a family film. The film may  be a bit complex for some young ones and demands some patients, something that is in short supply with many. But as the old saying goes, patients is a virtue, and those who wait will be rewarded.          

Unlike most  of Scorsese’s other works there are no bloody dead bodies proliferating on the sidelines as the film progresses. The most frightening aspect in the film is a Doberman with an intense instinct to hunt at the immediate command of its master, an intimidating railroad station policeman (Sacha Baron Cohen) who is after Hugo, wanting to place him in an orphanage, for most of the film. Other cast members include Christopher Lee, Emily Mortimer and Michael Stuhlbarg.

Advertisements

12 comments on “Hugo (2011) Martin Scorsese

  1. DorianTB says:

    John, Vinnie and I have been eager to catch up with HUGO since we first heard about it, and your thoughtful, affectionate review has made us even more eager to see it! In fact, we’re actually waiting to see HUGO at our favorite second-run theater, The Roxy in Northampton, PA near us, but it’s not just because ticket prices are lower (though they are: $3 for a matinee). You see, The Roxy is a vintage movie theater that’s been around for decades (indeed, it recently achieved landmark status), lovingly restored with its vintage decor intact. It’s a very popular theater here, and it seems like the perfect place to see HUGO! Here’s more info about The Roxy, if you and other readers are interested:

    http://www.roxytheaternorthampton.com/

    Excellent review, as always, John! Happy New Year to you and yours from all of us here at Team Bartilucci H.Q.!

    Like

    • John Greco says:

      Thanks Dorian and thanks for the link. The ROXY looks like a great theater. We have The TAMPA Theater here which goes back to the 1920’s. They generally show independent films and some classics along with some live shows. It’s great that theaters like this can still survive. Hope you get to se HUGO, think you will love it.

      …And a Happy New Year to you, Vinnie and family!

      Like

  2. John I am really dying to see this film, which still has not received a release out here in Poland. I’ve read so many good reviews of it from people whose opinions I respect. Quick thought bit for a future post: Has Christopher Lee perhaps got one of the greatest filmographies in cinema history? I think he’s now featured in almost every classic kids flick, genre classic, or major Hollywood franchise in recent memory, as well as straddling the divide between Golden-era Hollywood and the more splintered indie/studio scene of the sixties and seventies.

    Like

    • John Greco says:

      Lee’s career has been extensive. He does seem to appear, unexpectedly sometimes, in film after film. Good thought, I will give it some consideration.

      I do wish HUGO arrives in your part of the world soon. When it does I hope that you will share your thoughts on it.

      Like

  3. Sam Juliano says:

    John–

    I am thrilled that you have decided to review this film here, though I was alerted to your love for it in a previous comment you had made. It is surely one of the best films of 2011, a singular triumph for Martin Scorsese, and one of the most rapturous homages ever to a bygone era. From the very opening sequence when the camera glides past a snowy Eiffel Tower, on a path between two trains, then on to the train station and the overhead clock to Asa Butterfirld’s face I knew we were in for some exquisite stylistics. The performances were uniformly superlative, Dante Ferretti’s set design magnificent, and the use of 3D as good as any we’ve had before. This was Scorsese’s gift to his 12 year-old daughter, and Brian Selznick’s extraordinary Caldecott Medal winner was tailor-made for the director for all kinds of reasons.

    Wonderful review John!

    Like

    • John Greco says:

      I agree Sam, this is one of the best films of 2011 and thanks for mentioning Danit Ferrett’s set design which contributes so much to the production. Thanks again my friend!

      Like

  4. Colin says:

    I just nominated you for a blog award. You can read about it here:
    http://livius1.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/ending-the-year-on-a-high/

    Like

  5. Page says:

    John,
    I was fortunate enough to see Hugo a couple of weeks ago on my quest to see probable Oscar noms pre-Awards.
    The film was a visual orgasm! I’m not usually a fan of 3D but Hugo was so tastefully done and it was like a 2 hour love letter to old cinema. So I agree with your statement about the 3D enhancing the film without getting in the way. Well put!

    So glad you liked it as much as I did. A beautiful film and a treat for all ages.
    Happy New Year John! All the best for you and your wonderful blog in 2012! I’m honored that you’re a part of our little group.
    Page

    Like

    • John Greco says:

      “The film was a visual orgasm!”

      I felt the same way, even wanted to smoke a cigarette afterward, and I don’t even smoke! Seriously, HUGO is a stunningly visual film. I feel the same way about 3-D but this was an exception to the rule. My fear is this film is going to get passed over come award time.

      Happy New Year to you and yours Page, and I am honored to be part of such a fine group.

      Like

  6. […] Hugo (2011) Martin Scorsese (twentyfourframes.wordpress.com) […]

    Like

  7. […] Christopher, is seen hanging off a giant clock. Martin Scorsese also mimics the clock scene in  Hugo. his loving tribute to the […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s